It is the syncopation of each level of intuitive-being (intuition) that brings about harmonious living as a cumulative effect – the culmination of both cause and effect as a synchronizing ends-means. Each prior moment is as but a means of subsequent living built upon the former, a perpetuation of bygone events accrued as a thoughtful acquiescence to the former as a means of acquisition through growth or decay.
As a basic understanding the hierarchies of fundamental and developmental human behavior is as a universally fashioned criterion but a means by which to achieve any such overall harmony.
Between each facet of self-driven motive is a measure of enlightening adherence as but a single, binding strand of like-agenda dangled and entangled for the taking amid a confine of subliminally relegated DNA which boasts the synonymous, primordial core within each of us; albeit its attunement and clarifying acuity limited by the scope of cognizance within a given organism.
While human consciousness is an emanation from the self, of the self as but a perennial reverberation of its universal surroundings, its expenditure as an enlightening precursor must be aimed as a same-like-governing of those within its influential proximity as a congruence of delayed gratification back unto its host, i.e., “Give and it shall be given” – “We reap what we sow.”
As expanses are fathomed and their meanings deciphered the placements of thought must be as an extension of rendered axiom, minimally a consideration of unknown origin if only to not preclude ourselves from any such probability apart from dire rational; for that consciousness sought as aspiration has all and the propensity as to aspire to its own awaiting expanse.
Is therefore all inclination but an end to a means or in fact the means to creating its own new awakening as an immediate hereto conjured afterthought?
Is matter therefore nothing more than a matter of “pragmatic surrealism?” – a “post-requisite” awaiting its “pre-arrival” if you will? Are universes henceforth created via consciousness via thought?
My contention rests on the probability that via mindful invocation nothing is as unreasonable as anything impossible as we defer continuously to the “matter” of materialism in its most basic of tangible forms, yet apart from the length, width, breadth, girth, height and depth of matter is the immaterial means festered through thought; thus and again each preponderance of thought but a seed for future consideration toward that of probability.
Is therefore something created from nothing? If not, where then does each thought stem from if not the newness of nothingness? If so, what then is the crux of each new thought arisen?
Are we therefore nothing more than receptors of universal-emanation or emanations for universal inception, and does the universe therefore lead us to each new thought or does thought lead us to create each new universe?
Ongoing inquiry as a means of universal endeavor must therefore be openly considered, even into the rainbow, if we are to abide by any such notions of mindful smattering for even as we seek to understand the conscious aspects of man so too are the greater unknown facets of universal device in closest proximity to the crux of primordial confluence which I believe rendered its inception.
Within the bygone adherences of knowledge obtained, apart from the anonymity of synonymous, embedded acuity, I believe lay the kingdom of heavenly requisite we all too often fail to recognize within each of us.
For that all was born of the same infernal seed which unseen compels it, so too the very means by which to quench its insatiable thirst by the very means that has thirsted it – thought but a harvest of the same-like hand that has harvested it, indivisibly so.
