Evolution is a theory in search of evidence or for any real “science” to support it. For over 150 years, the proponents of evolution have claimed that the proof of whether evolution occurred on this planet would be contained in the fossil record. The fossil record has been examined again and again, and yet no evidence exists that evolution ever happened. You might think that this would end the debate, would you not? Not so fast.
Evolutionist T. H. Morgan says,
“Within the period of human history, we do not know of a single instance of the transformation of one species into another.”
http://books.google.com/books/about/Evolution_and_adaptation.html?id=9yVMAAAAMAAJ
And yet Oxford Professor Richard Dawkins expects rational people to believe that humans originated from reptiles in a manner similar to the way dog breeds have come about—a wild stretch requiring blind faith, to be sure, since despite the many variations of dog breeds, all remain dogs. No one has ever bred a poodle with a boxer and produced kittens, lizards or fishes.
British scientist Sir Cecil Wakely has said,
“There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, to support the theory of evolution.”
http://www.amazon.com/EVOLUTION-OR-CREATION-Professor-Enoch/dp/B000GSLUPU
So why are schools and nature programs still pushing it as fact? Famed British evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith provided the answer when he said, “Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it because the only alternative is special creation, which is unthinkable.”
http://www.amazon.com/Why-believe-creation-not-evolution/dp/B0007EHI36 This is not an indictment of scientific objectivity at work.
Harvard evolutionist George Gaylord Simpson said,
“It remains true, as every paleontologist knows, that most new species, genera, and families, and that nearly all categories above the level of families, appear in the record suddenly and are not led up to by gradual, completely transitional sequences.”
http://www.amazon.com/Troubled-Waters-Evolution-Madison-Morris/dp/0890510873
Zoologist H. Enoch agreed, saying,
“All major groups of invertebrates appear suddenly in the first fossiliferous strata of the earth with their distinct specializations, indicating that they were all created almost at the same time.”
http://www.amazon.com/EVOLUTION-OR-CREATION-Professor-Enoch/dp/B000GSLUPU Species mutating by small steps over billions of years simply did not occur on Earth—not ever.
One does not need to be a research scientist, however, to know that evolution is a dead theory—one that has become a millstone of humiliation around the necks of the stubborn and superstitious adherents to the cult of biological evolution. Interestingly, it is science—that objective, unbiased and valid field of study which demands verifiable proof of physical mechanics—that has been evolution’s most ardent and determined opponent.
Microbiology has demonstrated that within each living cell are tiny “machines” that perform specific functions within the unit walls–a concept that Dr. William Dembski calls “specified complexity.” Many of these are absolutely essential to the life of the cell such that the cell could not have adopted minute internal changes and lived. These sub-cellular components must necessarily have been present at the moment of the creation of the cell in order for the cell to have survived. Evolution cannot explain how this phenomenon could have been adapted from a previously living cell through a dumb and random accident of nature.
It is now known that the human body is infinitely more complex than Charles Darwin believed. The cells of organisms are not simply tiny blobs of protoplasm which spontaneously live or die or mutate until magically improved upon by a set of random influences imposed upon them. By the way, Charles Darwin gave up his own belief in God after the tragic death of his daughter—a terrible situation, but not one that serves as a solid basis for rational scientific study.
Science is not a field that requires a rare combination of esoteric mental talents. Anyone who has ever examined a bird’s egg shell and asked, “How?” examined an insect on a flower and asked, “Why?” or questioned his or her parents about how he or she came to life, is a scientist. And one thing that each knows about nature, is that it “tends toward disorder.” This is an inviolable natural law, the Second Law of Thermodynamics. So the term used by evolutionists, “natural selection,” is itself an oxymoron. Nature does not arrange, it disperses. Nature does not assemble, it tears apart. And nature does not create, it destroys.
That leaves Creationism, Special Creation and Intelligent Design as the only viable alternatives. If there is a design, and there certainly is, then there must have been a Designer, and if there is a Designer, he would own the right to tell mankind how to conduct himself, and that is exactly why the godless and ungodly fight so ferociously against it.
Evolution has masqueraded as a legitimate scientific belief for far too long. It is wholly unworthy of serious assertion. But the evidence against it and in favor of Creation is readily available for all who seek it, and that evidence is multiplied daily. The facts that permit this preposterous theory of evolution to be taught to school children are totally and shamefully absurd. Evolution should be relegated to the scrap-heap of archaic superstitious beliefs, along with the fear of sea monsters and of sailing ships falling off the edge of the earth.
